🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a prohibition on deploying national guard in the Oregon city, after a latest court ruling.

Judicial Panel Concurs to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals decided on this week that it would rehear the case concerning the president’s authority with an larger panel of 11 judges. The judicial body also vacated a previous ruling from a smaller judicial group that had supported the federal government.

Legal Saga Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the latest development in a protracted court case over whether the former president has the authority and justification to deploy state military units in Portland. Approximately two hundred troops have been in uncertainty since late September when the mobilization attempt was initiated in response to months of protests.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has argued that government employees at the ICE facility in south Portland were under attack, while city and state officials assert that municipal police have control of the circumstances.

Contrary to characterizations of the city as “war ravaged”, locals have been posting videos of scenic paths and a vibrant culinary culture, and organizing events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The Tuesday ruling came after a federal judge in the city issued two temporary restraining orders this period – one blocking the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another stopping the deployment of any national guard troops in the state, after efforts to circumvent the initial injunction by calling up out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the ninth circuit panel had put the first ruling on hold – allowing control of 200 Oregon national guard – but the subsequent injunction remained in place, preventing the actual deployment of the troops.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the issue will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under review together – by a panel of eleven justices.

“This ruling shows that facts are important and that the courts are striving to hold this administration accountable. The constitution limits the executive authority, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” said the state attorney general in a statement.

“The judicial body is sending a definite signal: the executive leader cannot dispatch the military into US cities without cause. We will continue defending Oregon’s laws, values, and autonomy as this legal proceeding moves forward and our legal battle continues in the courts.”